On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:41:27 +0200, Peter Rabbitson
( by further committing to the repository and/or shipping stuff to CPAN
under a group-controlled namespace ) would imply tacit endorsement of
the currently presented proposal for the project governance. I will not
You once told me every action you take and decision you make is done out
of a desire to create the best engineering possible for the end user.
I'm not sure how avoiding 'tacit endorsement' serves that purpose? Maybe
there's an angle i'm not seeing. Would you care to explain?
Searchable Archive: http://firstname.lastname@example.org