On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Andrew Beverley <a...@andybev.com> wrote:
> > Could you please clarify your proposal with details on that front and > > what is to happen should Peter be unable or unwilling to continue > > working on DBIC? > > It would be no different to any other module. Ribasushi nominates > someone should he be able to, otherwise: > > http://www.cpan.org/misc/cpan-faq.html#How_adopt_module > > Personally I trust Ribasushi to make such a nomination, and I know > others do. If there are more people that don't, then that's what this > vote is for. > > So to be absolutely clear, it sounds like proposal "B" is to grant Peter the unilateral power initially in dispute. I.e. he could – on arbitrary day N after your proposal is adopted – merge his remaining work, transfer permissions to an unknown person with an unknown mandate, and retire (aka. the original "project freeze" plan). (Of course, given his change in employment circumstances, he might not do that – he might faithfully continue to maintain DBIC for years to come.) Speaking as PAUSE administrator, there is no objection to "B" if that's what the community wants. It would merely be another way for the community to resolve the initial dispute. Regards, David -- David Golden <x...@xdg.me> Twitter/IRC/GitHub: @xdg
_______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
