Good score: the word "codeplex" appears 5 times in your message. :)
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 23:45, yuniti <[email protected]> wrote: > > Again no offense at all taken and I was in no way upset - I simply > figured as I got no response and I had these changes locally that I > didn't want to go to waste, that I may as well go to a different > medium where I knew I could get some work submitted. > > The prolem I have with "convnention" is that, clearly, someone new > won't know what the convention is, and someone not new is "useless" as > they are already part of the project heh. The idea here is we want to > make it really easy/simple for new users to join in, and convention > won't help us there. > > That's the nice thing about Codeplex - no convention. You just click > on a developer's name, and you're taken to a page where you can send > them a message. Unfortunately, Google Code doesn't have this option. > I realized after the fact (after having already created my group in > Codeplex) that all the activity happens here in the group - but there > isn't a strong linking between the forum posts and the google code > page (as opposed to Codeplex, where it's all inter-connected). > > Again, I'd recommend you guys have a look at Codeplex. I have no > problem submitting my code changes here, but if you have a look over > there, you'll see the interface is quite nicer than Google Code + > Google Groups (at least, for the purpose of working on an open-source > project where we want other developers to join in). > > I realize that an MIT license allows us to branch the source any time > we see fit, but that's somewhat pointless here as we all want the same > thing. I just get a feeling that it's a lot more difficult to > maintain this project and to get attention (and other developers) > using Google Code instead of Codeplex. > > On May 14, 10:23 am, Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't think it's possible to use a custom prefix for issues, so I've > > create a new dblinq-bugs group at Google Groups, which should now > > receive issue emails. Sign up at: > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq-bugs > > > > - Jon > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 09:29 +0200, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > > > I agree for a different group. > > > Alternativelly we should allow some tagging for email coming from > > > issue tracker (a [ISSUE] prefix in the subject or the so). > > > > > Giacomo > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 13:39 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > > Possibly a dumb question; but can the Google Issues "app" > > > notify the > > > > mailing list when something is created/commented/etc... > > > This list is > > > > fairly low volume [and generally very interesting] so it > > > doesn't seem > > > > like the "extra" traffic would be a problem. > > > > > Yes it can. Alas, it can only be sent to one email address > > > (odd, that). > > > > > So we could either send the issue emails to this list, or we > > > could > > > create a new Google group specifically for the issue emails > > > (and then > > > anyone could subscribe to that group if they want to receive > > > Issue > > > emails). > > > > > I'm inclined to create a new group for issue emails, and will > > > do so > > > unless a majority of people responding by tomorrow would > > > rather use this > > > list. > > > > > - Jon- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
