On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 13:21 +0200, Giacomo Tesio wrote:
> http://damieng.com/blog/2009/06/01/linq-to-sql-changes-in-net-40 Nice! And here I thought that Linq to SQL was effectively dead... > BTW, it quite clear that ITable<T> would probably require some (deep?) > refactoring for us... I'm not sure I see why. Wouldn't ITable<T> inherit from ITable and otherwise mimic the existing Table<T> class? Or is it completely different? - Jon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
