I absolutely do not know! May be our Table<T> might simply implement ITable<T>, but knowing MS, it will probably be coupled with some sealed class that depend internally on the internal microsoft code...
Giaocmo On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 13:21 +0200, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > > http://damieng.com/blog/2009/06/01/linq-to-sql-changes-in-net-40 > > Nice! > > And here I thought that Linq to SQL was effectively dead... > > BTW, it quite clear that ITable<T> would probably require some (deep?) > refactoring for us... > > I'm not sure I see why. Wouldn't ITable<T> inherit from ITable and > otherwise mimic the existing Table<T> class? Or is it completely > different? > > - Jon > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
