On 2/4/2004 10:46 AM, "Aaron Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, well I read the rest of the thread on forwards, and everyone there > advocates for Postfix to fully handle forwards by using the ??sql patches. > > Unfortunately, I think this places a pretty steep requirement onto the MTA to > a) have this capability or b) have the right patches applied and anyways, that > c) it is configured to use the dbmail database, too. > > There's gotta be a sane way for DBMail to send its own forwards properly... > As I stated about a month ago, the way to "fix" the bounces of mail that has reached dmail-smtp is add a FROM address parameter to the call syntax. Postfix can send along the sender address in the master.cf pipe line for dbmail-smtp sendmail handles this with a [EMAIL PROTECTED] type parameter. Add this in and many of these issues will clean themselves up very quickly. Until this is added, we are letting Postfix handles all forwards and bounces using additional fields in our aliases and users tables. Brian
