I think Ilja kicked the cached headers to 2.1 development... ""Jesse Norell"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > Is there any progress on the cached_header_types? I see you email at: > > http://mailman.fastxs.net/pipermail/dbmail/2003-December/003886.html > > I've not heard of anyone working on it with dbmail. I've started > playing with it in weDBmail, but (in addition to lack of time) I've > kind of been waiting for dbmail's schema to emerge so I can have > weDBmail use dbmail's tables, not it's own. (dbmail support for it > will probably be added in 2.2 or later, but I'll probably backport > it into 1.2 for weDBmail, we'll just have to do all the header > parsing/caching ourselves) > > -- > Jesse Norell > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not my email address; > change "administrator" to my first name. > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Dbmail-dev mailing list > Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org > http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev > --
