Jesse Norell wrote:
I think Ilja kicked the cached headers to 2.1 development...
Really? That'd be great! Ilja: while you're in that part of the code,
think you could stick a header flag in the messageblks table, to mark
which blocks are the headers? Should be trivial, and would make full-header
searches much easier for clients like weDBmail. That's been discussed
in the past vs. moving headers to their own table... if the latter idea
seems preferable, then don't worry about it, but it seems you get almost
all the advantages with just adding a flag to messageblks.
I think it would be cleaner to put the message headers into their own
table. Very searchable, and clearly distinct from the message body.
