Aaron Stone wrote:
I was looking at the development task list today, and thinking that there are
a lot of table changes scheduled for the 2.1 series. It doesn't look like
we're going to be changing any of the existing tables, but just adding new
tables to support config data, Sieve scripts and parsed headers.
The one thing that really strikes me as changing is the table prefixes. As
part of my effort to push through changes that we want for a stable, long
lived dbmail 2.0 branch, I think we should have table prefixes of 'dbmail_'.
In 2.1, we might add the code for fully configurable names, but start with a
default of 'dbmail_' just like it would be in 2.0.
Yes, no, maybe?
I don't think we should do this right now. If we make table names
configurable in 2.1, it will also function without a prefix. I don't
like the idea of making all these changes in the database layer at this
moment.
Ilja
--
Ilja Booij
IC&S B.V.
Stadhouderslaan 57
3583 JD Utrecht
www.ic-s.nl
T algemeen: 030 6355730
T direct: 030 6355739
F: 030 6355731
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
