Aaron Stone wrote:
Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I don't think we should do this right now. If we make table names
configurable in 2.1, it will also function without a prefix. I don't
like the idea of making all these changes in the database layer at this
moment.
On the one hand, this change is abrupt before a release. But the people
affected by it are those following the bleeding edge of rc's and CVS, folks
who are more likely to understand the usefulness of a change like this.
Release candidates are not supposed to be bleeding edge! I have been
wanting to say this for a while, but I think dbmail misuses terms in
it's release process. We have been in RC mode for months on end, and
during this period we have continued to add features and make major
changes to almost every part of dbmail. Lots of projects wouldn't let
these types of invasive changes be made even after the 1st beta.
I don't think we should call anything a release candidate until we think
it really is a candidate for release, meaning feature freeze long since
passed, all known bugs squashed, ready for release barring newly exposed
problems.
Matthew
