Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Aaron Stone wrote: >> >>By then we'll have a more featureful and tolerant MIME parser anyways, but >>it's still a good idea in general to be able to copy any major errors >>during message delivery over to the postmaster. >> > That would imply parsing every message on delivery..would that make > sense? A lot of messages don't have to be parsed, because they're only > retreived using POP. Sounds like a waste of resources to me, unless we > have other reasons to parse the message.
Isn't that the plan for the header and mime cache table? It would certainly make sense to be able to disable parse-on-delivery if you only use POP, but most people probably use all IMAP or a mixture of the two. > So, at the moment I'm looking into the possibility of setting a > different from: address for the messages, > which should be read from the config file. I'm concerned that the intended recipient won't have any notification that a message almost came through. The postmaster gets a copy to know that something broke, but first and foremost, the intended recipient needs a copy. Aaron
