-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jesse Norell wrote: |> Is this patch |>consistent with the header caching features that everyone is talking |>about? | | | I believe the two are unrelated, and offer different (though often similar) | benefits, so there wouldn't be any inconsistency. The most common searches | will benefit from a message datum (headers + whatever else) cache, and searches/ | retrieval of all headers will be faster with the is_header flag. Like Jesse says, no inconsistency. Both will help, but is_header is much simpler to implement. - -- ~ ________________________________________________________________ ~ Paul Stevens mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ NET FACILITIES GROUP PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBSHbY8iITvBH4zTERAsDZAKDFay+iar7uinCAkSsH8iFXET8OeACfYhFx wKBnN65L2+N6se66PxiOKI8= =zzWS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
