On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:54:09 -0400, Matthew T. O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net> wrote: > Paul J Stevens wrote: > > I've just committed the is_header functionality. The committed patch > > will use the is_header field in the messageblks table only during > > insertion. Since we have to make sure all headerblks are marked as such > > before we can use this for retrieval, some transitional phase is required. > > Committed to HEAD I assume? Not 2.0 Branch?
Don't worry. A lot is going into HEAD. Only fixes are going into 2.0 branch. There's already quite a difference between HEAD and 2.0 branch (preforking, dynamic table prefixes, transaction use for delivery) Ilja
