Paul J Stevens wrote: > > Paul: could you please merge your is_header usage ASAP? I actually > think > > I know how to code a much faster FETCH (about 5 to 8 times faster by > my > > estimate), as soon as is_header usage is in place. I'd like to try > my > > hand against that version. > > Merge with what? That patch was merged with cvs-head about a month > ago.
An important question: is the code in cvs head currently up-to-date regarding your refactoring of _ic_fetch()? I think I know how to code a much faster fetching with 2.0 code (I even have guessed how to do it without is_header), but as I understand, this would be of little value, given teh changes. I'd better patch against the updated version - and so, do I need to wait for a merge? I'd really prefer not to wait, because this change (if it produces the desired results) will make dbmail somewhat usable for me, finally. I promise - no new statics this time :) Yours, Mikhail Ramendik
