Sorry Mikhail, the patch I have prepared is quit big but not yet fully tested.
So just use cvs-head. The patch I'm working on is a splitup of _ic_fetch and
some cosmetic cleanups elsewhere. If your idea works out, I'll take care of the
merging.
I prefer well-tested patches as opposed to unfinished or untested code, of
course :)
Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Paul: could you please merge your is_header usage ASAP? I actually
think
I know how to code a much faster FETCH (about 5 to 8 times faster by
my
estimate), as soon as is_header usage is in place. I'd like to try
my
hand against that version.
Merge with what? That patch was merged with cvs-head about a month
ago.
An important question: is the code in cvs head currently up-to-date
regarding your refactoring of _ic_fetch()?
I think I know how to code a much faster fetching with 2.0 code (I even
have guessed how to do it without is_header), but as I understand, this
would be of little value, given teh changes. I'd better patch against
the updated version - and so, do I need to wait for a merge?
I'd really prefer not to wait, because this change (if it produces the
desired results) will make dbmail somewhat usable for me, finally.
I promise - no new statics this time :)
Yours, Mikhail Ramendik
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
--
________________________________________________________________
Paul Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
The Netherlands_______________________________________www.nfg.nl
