Aaron Stone wrote:
Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I think your idea to use the delivered-to field as a reply-to field is
very dangerous. If mail comes in that doesn't specify the recipient in
the To or CC fields chances are pretty good that you are dealing with
BCC, be it from a mailinglist or a spammer. Neither should be replied to.
Replying to a BCC may give away the fact that you've been copied on a
message someone might not otherwise want, or expect, you to be reading.
Very bad.
Are you suggesting that we would check the To and CC fields against a
user's aliases, and only send vacations for things which appear to be
"personally adressed" to the recipient?
My point exactly.
--
________________________________________________________________
Paul Stevens mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NET FACILITIES GROUP PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
