Can anyone tell me if the server is following the IMAP protocol in the following dialog? The EXISTS and RECENT responses before the FETCH are throwing off my IMAP client[1], and I'm trying to figure out if it's a problem with DBMail or the client. I'm printing out rfc 3501 now, but I thought someone might know off the top of their head.
1. http://pear.php.net/package/Net_IMAP Thanks, Christian C: A0008 FETCH 10520 BODY[HEADER] S: * 10607 EXISTS S: * 10607 RECENT S: * 10520 FETCH (BODY[HEADER] {1487} >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 11 16: 31:04 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:31:04 -0700 Received: from user-118bpki.cable.mindspring.com ([66.133.230.146] helo=cumin.xerus.org) .by mta-2.mpe-west.postica.net with esmtpsa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) .id 1E3MVr-0000tZ-8F .for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:31:04 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=cumin.xerus.org) .by cumin.xerus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) .id 1E3MVq-0004fM-Va .for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:31:02 -0700 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:31:02 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:31:02 -0700 X-Mailer: swaks v20050625.8 jetmore.org/john/code/#swaks Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender-Verification: OK X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-0.5 points) .pts rule name description .---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- .0.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name .-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% .[score: 0.0000] .2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address .[66.133.230.146 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] .0.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-loc 064.070.039.101.00143-192.168.001.006.44133: al SMTP .[66.133.230.146 listed in combined.njabl.org] X-Postica-ID: 1E3MVr-0000tZ-8F ) S: A0008 OK FETCH completed
