Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: 
>That makes sense. Fetching is still very much sub-optimal in dbmail atm.
>I've redone sorting which should be very fast, but fetch is still
>refactored 2.0 style code. It doesn't take advantage of the header
>caches very much yet, and is not very smart about message ranges.

Yes, that seems to be main problem. Do you have a time line when you want to
have a look at this?

-- 
Lars Kneschke
Metaways Infosystems GmbH
Pickhuben 4
20457 Hamburg
Germany

eGroupWare Training & Support ==> http://www.egroupware-support.net

E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:    http://www.metaways.de
Tel:    +49 (0)40 317031-21
Fax:    +49 (0)40 317031-81
Mobile: +49 (0)175 9304324


Reply via email to