Lars Kneschke wrote: > Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >> That makes sense. Fetching is still very much sub-optimal in dbmail atm. >> I've redone sorting which should be very fast, but fetch is still >> refactored 2.0 style code. It doesn't take advantage of the header >> caches very much yet, and is not very smart about message ranges. > > Yes, that seems to be main problem. Do you have a time line when you want to > have a look at this?
Most of the work is done already. But integration into the current codebase will have to wait until later this year (2.3+) -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
