Leander Koornneef wrote:
> On 7/2/07 2:36 AM, Aaron Stone wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 1, 2007, Jake Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>> can we do anything about this?
>> The common thread appears to be including '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the To
>> header. Perhaps there's a filter that allows those through without
>> requiring list membership. IC&S is running the lists; I wonder if someone
>> there is still lurking and has noticed this problem?
> 
> Yes, I've noticed it too, although SpamAssassin does a fine job
> catching them :-)
> 
> However, the problem is not with the recipient; the sender address
> is also [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've whitelisted this address so the
> bugtracker can send mails to dbmail-dev. The easiest workaround
> would be to change the sender address in the DBmail bugtracker,
> but I'm not sure if this will break anything? Just say the word and I'll
> change it into (e.g.) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You should fix your postfix configuration to allow the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sender only when the sender smtp address is inside
IC&S network.


-- 
  ________________________________________________________________
  Paul Stevens                                      paul at nfg.nl
  NET FACILITIES GROUP                     GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
  The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

Reply via email to