Hello Richard, Saturday, December 7, 2002, 6:12:51 AM, you wrote:
RB> Just my opinion, but I guess that's not really the market that dbmail is aimed RB> at? If the complexity/overhead of pgsql or mysql is too much, why not just stick RB> with regular mail spools? Because they are slow, many are buggy, require too much work for setup, etc. Dbmail is so much nicer... don't you think ? The idea behind SQLite is having a quick and easy setup; a version working out of the box and that would be just ok for MANY installations. I'm not in any way thinking in replacing MySQL or PostgreSQL. RB> OTOH, the dbmail facilitates adding other dbms easy enough, so why not investigate RB> further. A Sleepycat Berkeley DB (Transactional Data Store version, possibly) RB> system could be worth looking at too. Do they support SQL ? If they do, might be worth investigating. Also SQLite is a fraction of their size... RB> One thing tho': After reading the SQLLite page, I'm not too sure if it would RB> play nice with all the server processes... ? It should be, unless you have thousands of transactions per second. But if you do, you'll be better using a full RDBMS anyway. ------------- Best regards, Steve Howe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
