On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:15:24AM -0700, Jesse Norell wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:48:47PM +0100, Pablo Le?n wrote: > > > Yes, these messages are copletely missing the Date: header. Par > example, > > > a printer reporting a paper-jam situatuion sends me a message without > > > date: field, just because the printer don't have an internal clock! I > > > think the cuestion is how to best deal with these > non-rfc-compliant emails. > > > > You could have your mta add a date header if it doesn't exist. > > > What mta are you using? Offhand I don't know of any that _don't_ > add a Date: when it's missing. I suppose that could be checked > by dbmail at message injection time too, and add one if missing, but > that's really not dbmail's job.
As of 4.30, Exim no longer automatically adds From, Date, or Message-Id headers to messages received from remote hosts. xn
