On Saturday 09 April 2005 19:15, Paul J Stevens wrote: > Also, after hitting such a mail, dbmail-util won't barf any longer and just > continue with the next message.
Ah. Perfect! That way I can easily get some more messages (broken ones *g*) to you to give you a broader sample to test with. Available on request. > Like I said, that shouldn't happen anymore. Pick up a snapshot if you like, > or wait for 2.1.1 Are you sure you checked it in? My subversion pull at 21:20 CEST still shows you at revision 1749. > The one you sent me was pretty readable. I had it figured out about .003 seconds after asking. :-) The DB is easy to comprehend on first sight. > Was that an example of a message that caused dbmail-imapd to hangup? If not, > could you sent me such a message as well? I can't say if the crash-causing messages also cause the hangs - yet. I'll look into that tomorrow. If you'd like to get together in IRC or IM just send or request contact info via PM, preferrably encrypted.. > can easily switch back to 2.0.4 on the same database after trying 2.1.0. That's nice to know, just in case. :-) -- With best regards, Florian Weber PGP key ID: A34C32F9
