[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I've used Squirrelmail but found it too slow, >> I've used Roundcube but it ate alot of CPU on my desktop and killed >> Internet Explorer after 10mins. >> > > How come you found squirrelmail slow? I have a number of mailinglist > mailboxes with >20k messages in them which are incredibly fast. You do > need to enable server-side sorting for this... > > There is one very annoying bug however: not all attachments can be > retrieved from the database. Thunderbird does retrieve them correctly, so > it must be a client issue. > > I am currently investigating FelamiMail (part of egroupware) as suggested > on the list a couple of days ago, but this seems to exhibit the same > behaviour as squirrelmail.
It's not unlikely that it's a dbmail issue. Thunderbird uses different imap commands than squirrelmail, and bugs may well still lurk in the FETCH code. If you can reproduce the problematic retrieval of attachments, please file a bug and post a level5 log in the bug report. -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
