> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> I've used Squirrelmail but found it too slow, >>> I've used Roundcube but it ate alot of CPU on my desktop and killed >>> Internet Explorer after 10mins. >>> >> >> How come you found squirrelmail slow? I have a number of mailinglist >> mailboxes with >20k messages in them which are incredibly fast. You do >> need to enable server-side sorting for this... >> >> There is one very annoying bug however: not all attachments can be >> retrieved from the database. Thunderbird does retrieve them correctly, >> so >> it must be a client issue. >> >> I am currently investigating FelamiMail (part of egroupware) as >> suggested >> on the list a couple of days ago, but this seems to exhibit the same >> behaviour as squirrelmail. > > It's not unlikely that it's a dbmail issue. Thunderbird uses different > imap commands than squirrelmail, and bugs may well still lurk in the > FETCH code. > > If you can reproduce the problematic retrieval of attachments, please > file a bug and post a level5 log in the bug report. >
I upgraded from 2.1.6 to 2.1.7, but the problem still exists in 2.1.7. Created a ticket (00399) and added a level 5 trace (hope it is enough) and did some digging in the database to provide some details of the message and the actual msgblks. Let me know (off list?) if you need any more data. Regards, Stanley.
