> Ok, I just did the test on mysql 5.0.27. It took 73 seconds > to deliver the 1000 messages. So, it's a good bit faster than > 4.1.20's 95 seconds, but still pales in comparison to > postgres' 9 seconds. Mysql was still peaking both cpu cores > during delivery. > > > On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:23:58 -0800 > Michael Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Matthew O'Connor wrote: > > > Lars Kneschke wrote: > > >> Justin McAleer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > I think a test of 5.0 and 8.2 would be great! Recent benchmarks of > > the two show pg really blows the socks off mysql, so a > confirmation of > > that in the email segmnent would be terrific!!! > > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > > DBmail mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > >
Good to know. I, like others have mentioned, think message insertion benchmarks are largely irrelevant. Users guage performance on how quickly they can get at their stuff, not on how quickly their stuff gets to where they can get at it. :^) Has anyone come up with a way to benchmark POP/IMAP performance?
