Christoph Schug wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006, Paul J Stevens wrote:
> 
>> Michael Monnerie wrote:
>>> already. I heard in some RFC they say that upper/lowercase should be a 
>>> difference, but I never saw that in live use.
>> That's incorrect. Email addresses are case-insensitive.
> 
> Am I missing something? RFC 2821 clearly states ...
> 
> | The local-part of a mailbox MUST BE treated as case sensitive.
> | Therefore, SMTP implementations MUST take care to preserve the case
> | of mailbox local-parts. Mailbox domains are not case sensitive. In
> | particular, for some hosts the user "smith" is different from the
> | user "Smith". However, exploiting the case sensitivity of mailbox
> | local-parts impedes interoperability and is discouraged.
> 
> I would rather expect, that this behaviour is maintained even in some
> backend. Even if it's not common case to have two different email
> addresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED], IMHO any serious
> email software should be able to behave RFC compliant by default.

I disagree. Dbmail is *not* an SMTP server so we don't have to follow
smtp rules. I'm sure that if dbmail starts bouncing mail because of
strict case sensitive LHS matching, that would upset a lot of people.





-- 
  ________________________________________________________________
  Paul Stevens                                      paul at nfg.nl
  NET FACILITIES GROUP                     GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
  The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Reply via email to