Christoph Schug wrote:
> I agree with you that this is not a very common setup, nevertheless it
> is explicitly defined by the standard. Thus, it's more a question of
> ruling principle here. Violating standards intentionally just to make
> ignorant people happy might not pay out on the long term.
Testing insertion of email to different addresses in case only results
in expected behaviour:
Doing on a simple vanilla postfix setup:
mail -s test [EMAIL PROTECTED] </dev/null
mail -s test [EMAIL PROTECTED] </dev/null
results in two mails in /var/mail/paul
no surprises, no bounces
from local(8):
CASE FOLDING
All delivery decisions are made using the bare recipient
name (i.e. the address localpart), folded to lower case.
Now you can go tell Wietse his software violates the RFC :-)
--
________________________________________________________________
Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl
NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
