On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 12:59 +1000, Josh Marshall wrote: > Aaron Stone wrote: > > Perdition would solve the IMAP UID problem, but it doesn't help with the > > plain old auto_increment collisions... > > > > If we combined Perdition with per-server auto_increment id windows, then > > I think we'd be onto something! > > > > So you don't think you need to have smtp delivered to the particular > server? What if an email is delivered at the same time an email is > copied into the folder? I realise this is probably rare but it will happen.
You're exactly correct, and Perdition does not appear to do SMTP, so we're actually not onto something yet :-\ > If that's not a problem, does anyone have a working example of failing > over the perdition config in the case of a server failure? > > That said I'm still looking at the possibility of using Postgres and > MySQL to split the dbmail / dspam databases up... I'll get a setup > eventually :) That should work fine, although I'm not sure why you'd want to! They're going to be in separate databases probably, and separate tables for sure, so it's not like you're load balancing by using two totally different database systems. Aaron _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
