On Thu, Apr 26, 2007, Michael Monnerie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:

> On Donnerstag, 26. April 2007 09:51 Aaron Stone wrote:
>> > Yes, and when you're at it, a sieve script "per domain" would be
>> > nice, too. In my case, I extended dbmail to group several domains
>> > to their respecitve owner, a "per owner" sieve would also be nice.
>> > Everybody wants their SPAM filtered a bit different...
>>
>> How does per-owner differ from per-user? Different names for the same
>> thing?
> 
> I mean that a customer can have 3 domains. One account is admin, I call
> it "owner", or "superuser" of all those domains. Mostly, these 3
> domains are just aliases (foo.com, foo.bar, foo.at), but sometimes one
> domain can have independent uses and users, but still belong to the
> same company (e.g. ironrecycling.at, plasticrecycling.at could have
> independent people working on stuff, still the same company). That's
> why an "owner" should be able to have scripts, as well as a "domain",
> and finally a single "user".
> 
>> Per-domain as in one script for everyone @somedomain? We don't have
>> the infrastructure for that at all, and I'd argue we don't even
>> really have this concept at all in DBMail.=20
> 
> Yes, I extended dbmail with a "domains" table for this purpose. It makes
> setting up alias domains very easy, rewriting is a single select, and
> querying for domains can't be easier :-)
> 
> I'd love this to be standard dbmail stuff, and wonder why it isn't.
> Looks like the concept currently is to support in-house installations
> within a single company, while we are ISP style.
> 
>> The next nearest thing is
>> the clientid, which we're not yet using to much effect; an additional
>> sieve script might be one more good thing to associate with each
>> client.
> 
> I use that field to assign domains by now :-)
> 
> If you're interested, I could provide the schema, postfix select
> statements etc., because I would prefer this being standard dbmail
> stuff, rather than patching it during the next years 8-)

Sure, go ahead and make a wiki page explaining your patch and schema. Link
it to the 2.3 development ideas page. Note that we also have this idea:
http://dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=groups
Don't replace that page, but let's definitely build off some of the ideas
there.

Aaron
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Reply via email to