On 5/21/07, Aaron Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:58 +0200, Paul J Stevens wrote:
> zamri wrote:
> > On 5/16/07, zamri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I got this "warnings" and similar in various parts of compilation:
> >>
> >> maintenance.c: In function 'do_purge_deleted':
> >> maintenance.c:296: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long
> >> unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'guint64'
>
> Aaron, this smells like the solaris fix we did recently in mailbox_status.
>
> Can we safely use %llu to printf u64_t, or should we change them all to %u?
>
I'm not sure. I manually checked the type sizes and they are OK on
Linux / amd64, despite the warnings. We might need some deeper
autoconfoolery to pick the right type. As guint64 is a Glib provided
typedef, let's ask over there if people are seeing problems with
actually using this type in printf statements.
Aaron
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Any news about this? I won't upgrade yet since I am paranoid with all
the problems I read in this ML about 2.2.5.
--
zamri
Linux System Administrator
Kolej ShahPutra Kuantan
Pahang Malaysia
Tel : 609.573.777.7 ext 119
web : http://muhdzamri.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
