On 5/24/07, Aaron Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 17:54 +0800, zamri wrote:
> On 5/21/07, Aaron Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:58 +0200, Paul J Stevens wrote:
> > > zamri wrote:
> > > > On 5/16/07, zamri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> I got this "warnings" and similar in various parts of compilation:
> > > >>
> > > >> maintenance.c: In function 'do_purge_deleted':
> > > >> maintenance.c:296: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long
> > > >> unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'guint64'
> > >
> > > Aaron, this smells like the solaris fix we did recently in mailbox_status.
> > >
> > > Can we safely use %llu to printf u64_t, or should we change them all to
%u?
> > >
> >
> > I'm not sure. I manually checked the type sizes and they are OK on
> > Linux / amd64, despite the warnings. We might need some deeper
> > autoconfoolery to pick the right type. As guint64 is a Glib provided
> > typedef, let's ask over there if people are seeing problems with
> > actually using this type in printf statements.
> >
> > Aaron
> Any news about this? I won't upgrade yet since I am paranoid with all
> the problems I read in this ML about 2.2.5.
The warnings appear to be harmless. We will try to find a better type
that gcc on x86-64 doesn't get angry about, but I have not seen any
functionality problems on my x86-64 box.
Aaron
Thanks Aaron for the info. Are u going to eliminate those warnings
before finalizing 2.2.5?
--
zamri
Linux System Administrator
Kolej ShahPutra Kuantan
Pahang Malaysia
Tel : 609.573.777.7 ext 119
web : http://muhdzamri.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
