Sounds migratory...
But it might be the best approach.

I think at the current state of the art the following is reasonably true:
SHA1/MD5 is fast enough for the typically allowed file sizes in a mail
system (10MB) given the frequency with which they occur.

If someone has a future need of 100MB or 10GB file sizes as the norm then
we can also expect to be looking a quad-core also being the norm --
making all things equal.

If they have a current need for 100MB files, then they probably already
have a really big server at their disposal.

One thing I do like about dbmail is the scalability.  I interpret this to
mean both small and large mail environments can use with application
with existing or reasonably hardware.  To require super huge machines
for a personal domain isn't very scalable.

On 6/4/2007, "Paul J Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>Tom Allison wrote:
>>
>> So if I add one line at the end of a word doc, this will be considered
>> to be the same file unless the file format includes something unique
>> within the first 8MB of the file?
>
>My point also. Doing sha1 on the whole file seems to make the most sense. 
>People
>who want to do bigger files faster can simply add more lmtpd hosts with bigger
>cpus and more ram.
>
>The proposed schema has some merit, but I would rather setup two new tables
>(partslists and mimeparts) which would be functionally like Jonathan's two
>tables. Main difference is I want to leave the current tables as they are: new
>messages get inserted into the new setup, and old messages are left in the old
>format until converted by a lo-pri run of dbmail-util. The message retrieval
>code would then first try to reconstruct the message from the new tables and
>failing that use the 'old' current setup.
>
>
>--
>  ________________________________________________________________
>  Paul Stevens                                      paul at nfg.nl
>  NET FACILITIES GROUP                     GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
>  The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
>_______________________________________________
>DBmail mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Reply via email to