Aaron Stone wrote: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2007, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> Charles Marcus wrote: >>> SiS could always simply be a config option... so if you don't want the >>> overhead, don't enable it... >> Better yet: don't add the new tables (when I publish them) and dbmail will >> gracefully downgrade to the old/current behaviour. > > But let's avoid parallel code paths and database schemas wherever > possible.
There's this weird word called deprecation. There's actually very low cost in maintaining the current message handling code for the time being. Mark it as such, and leave it be. It's well isolated. -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
