Hi, Yes we do, squirrelmail > imapproxy > dbmail-imapd (via inetd).
James Greig > Just to check. You are using imapproxy right? > Even for home use it makes webmail/squirel mail way faster. > > James Greig wrote: >> Thanx for the response guys. >> >> On a side note I actually work for the same ISP as Jon Duggan >> who has been discussing other issues we've had mainly related to 579. >> >> The performance overall is fine we get no queues, pop3 is fine and >> general >> imap is fine. The only issues we have had is related to combined webmail >> + >> imap. As said above, imap on its own runs perfectly. >> >> With imap and webmail together we've had numerous issues with >> performance >> and bug 579. Though, we've been working franticly on things that could >> help it. >> >> I've made the changes that you had stated with regards to innodb in >> mysql >> and that seems to have assisted performance slightly. >> >> One other thing that we've been testing is with round cube instead of >> squirrelmail and round cube in my opinion so far seems by far a lot >> quicker >> and more reliable. >> >> As you may already know this is a live server with between 4-5k of >> users, >> i.e. if something breaks we get a phone call pretty much immediately >> which >> is nice! lol. >> >> Any other suggestions anyone may have with regards to webmail+imap and >> performance i'm all ears. >> >> Thanx >> >> James Greig >> >>> Aleksander Kamenik wrote: >>> >>>> James Greig wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> We have a dbmail setup with around 5000 users using dbmail setup >>>>> across >>>>> several machines. The MYSql server is on a pe 2950 quad 3ghz with 2 >>>>> gig >>>>> of RAM. MYSql is the ONLY service on this machine. Does anyone have >>>>> a >>>>> recommended my.cnf for dbmail on an innodb database. >>>>> >>>> pop3 or imap? >>>> >>> Indeed. For pop3 dbmail and mysql won't even break a sweat. If James is >>> offering >>> imap (and all users actually use imap) I'm sure many people on this >>> list >>> will be >>> interested in learning about the performance characteristics. >>> >>> If imap is the case: James: please subscribe to the dbmail-dev list so >>> we >>> can >>> identify and work on any performance bottlenecks you encounter. >>> >>> >>>>> innodb_buffer_pool_size = 512M >>>>> >>>> I would increase this one, you should have available memory. >>>> >>>> >>>>> innodb_log_file_size = 5M >>>>> >>>> Various my.cnf files say innodb_log_file_size should be 25% of >>>> innodb_buffer_pool_size. I'd don't know exactly why though. >>>> >>>> >>>> HTH, >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> ________________________________________________________________ >>> Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl >>> NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 >>> The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl >>> _______________________________________________ >>> DBmail mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > !DSPAM:3,468cee42209516765012172! > _______________________________________________ > DBmail mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > > > !DSPAM:3,468cee42209516765012172! > -- James Greig Mor-Pah Studios http://www.mor-pah.net _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
