Peter Rabbitson wrote: > Uwe Kiewel wrote: >> My conclusion for this topic after our short discussion is to let >> dbmail-util maintain the content and >> to maintain the db itself by a dba. > > Cool :)
Agreed. In the past 'OPTIMIZE' *was* used. It was replaced with 'ANALYZE' exactly because of table locking issues and related downtime. > >> Hint: I'm still using the 2.2 schema. > > Same here. 2.3 is way too new for my taste. And I never suggested otherwise, I hope. I'm not using it on more than a single in-house production system myself. The rest is all on 2.2. The new threaded server code still needs some major work. -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
