Aaron Stone wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > >> Aaron Stone wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 6, 2008, at 4:10 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> If something matches we examine every forward destination. If it is an >>>> email address of the form: >>>> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] - we just forward >>>> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] AND there was a YYY above we send to [EMAIL >>>> PROTECTED] (using >>>> the >>>> same delimiter as found in the forward in case we recognize multiple >>>> delimiters) >>> >>> I'm not sure I get what you mean here... >>> >> >> Suppose we do: >> >> dbmail-users -x [EMAIL PROTECTED] -t [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Then it would be neat (and logical) for any email to >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This is just (to me) a logical extension of what is already in place. >> The original bug complains only about the lack of XXX+YYY@ support. > > > Oh, that's pretty neat. Currently the forward should work but with the > +mailbox removed. Does that work in practice for you? >
I am not sure what your question is here. Can you clarify? Peter _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
