On Oct 6, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:58 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:29 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 4:10 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
If something matches we examine every forward destination.
If it
is an
email address of the form:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] - we just forward
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] AND there was a YYY above we send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(using
the
same delimiter as found in the forward in case we recognize
multiple
delimiters)
I'm not sure I get what you mean here...
Suppose we do:
dbmail-users -x [EMAIL PROTECTED] -t [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then it would be neat (and logical) for any email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to be forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is just (to me) a logical extension of what is already in
place.
The original bug complains only about the lack of XXX+YYY@
support.
Oh, that's pretty neat. Currently the forward should work but
with the
+mailbox removed. Does that work in practice for you?
I am not sure what your question is here. Can you clarify?
Mail addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] where a forward exists for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will work, but the original message will go into WWW's
Inbox. At
least, that's what I think happens; I haven't tried this in a
while.
Yes this is what happens. And what I was proposing is expand on this
schema to allow the sub-addressing to be carried over to the
destination
(unless the destination doesn't _already_ specify a sub-address on
its
own, in which case things have to be left intact)
I'm pretty sure this is significantly non-trivial, but I'll take a
look
and see!
Oh... I thought it will be an additional line or two, as you already
have extracted all the relevant information while processing the
address
against the alias/forward table...
If it is indeed a non-trivial feature request, please disregard it.
I am
happy enough that XXX+YYY@ will get fixed :)
Thank you for your time
I'm working on the simpler case now. Carrying the mailbox into the
forward is indeed not so easy. I'll note in the code where it could be
added in the future.
Aaron
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
