The way autoreplies are processed is wrong and dangerous * In the MUA i see not from which address the reply comes * Many servers will block as long the "From:" is the sender of original mail
Normally i should get in this sample am mail "From: [email protected]" instead "[email protected]" "To: [email protected]" instead "undisclosed-recipients" Loops should not happen because the replycache-table As long both addresses are on the same server this is not so important, but if we send mails from @gmx.net, @yahoo.com... the replies will never get received and finally our server could be blocked somewhere Received: by mail.thelounge.net (Postfix, from userid 493) id 2E978C0; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:15:26 +0100 (CET) From: [email protected] Subject: Re: Reply-Test X-DBMail-Reply: [email protected] Message-Id: <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:15:26 +0100 (CET) To: undisclosed-recipients: ; Return-Path: [email protected] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -- Reindl Harald the lounge interactive design GmbH A-1060 Vienna | Hofmühlgasse 17 software-development / cms-solutions phone: +43 (1) 595 3999 33 cellular: +43 (676) 40 221 40 icq: 154546673 mailto:[email protected] http://www.thelounge.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
