Harald, For the record: the autoreply table is documented (only on the wiki) as being dangerous, unsupported, deprecated, etc.... It's been removed completely in the 2.3 releases.
The only auto-reply feature that is safe and supported is sieve. Looking the the headers shown below, you're using the dbmail_auto_replies table. Don't! Reindl Harald wrote: > The way autoreplies are processed is wrong and dangerous > > * In the MUA i see not from which address the reply comes > * Many servers will block as long the "From:" is the sender of original mail > > Normally i should get in this sample am mail > "From: [email protected]" instead "[email protected]" > "To: [email protected]" instead "undisclosed-recipients" > > Loops should not happen because the replycache-table > As long both addresses are on the same server this is not so important, > but if we send mails from @gmx.net, @yahoo.com... the replies will > never get received and finally our server could be blocked somewhere > > > Received: by mail.thelounge.net (Postfix, from userid 493) id 2E978C0; > Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:15:26 +0100 (CET) > From: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Reply-Test > X-DBMail-Reply: [email protected] > Message-Id: <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:15:26 +0100 (CET) > To: undisclosed-recipients: ; > Return-Path: [email protected] > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > DBmail mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
