Hi Kasun, On 6/18/13 3:10 AM, kasun perera wrote: > I started working on integrating Airpedia types to Dbpedia-links. Cool! We are currently discussing how to model the integration in terms of semantics. Once we are done, I'll give you more details. > > As Marco mentioned previously, these are the 3 data-sets that I can use > and I need to analyze what is the best data set that to be integrated in > to the Dbpedia. > <http://airpedia.org/extraction/10-all> > extracted using classifier with all kernels and the bottom-to-top strategy. > <http://airpedia.org/extraction/10-all-top> > extracted using classifier with all kernels and the top-to-bottom strategy > <http://airpedia.org/extraction/10-tpl> > extracted using classifier with the sole template kernel and the > bottom-to-top strategy > > In Alessio et. al. ESWC paper, I can see it has already done some tests > to measure precision and recall of these classifications. Can I use > those results to select best Airpedia data-set for dbpedia? or do I need > to test with another data set(the ones Aleksander mentioned) to measure > precision and recall? > > Thanks > -- > Regards > > Kasun Perera > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dbpedia-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-developers >
-- Marco Fossati http://about.me/marco.fossati Twitter: @hjfocs Skype: hell_j ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-developers
