So these entity types are a new set separated in to languages.
I can see these triples are following format
<http://be.dbpedia.org/resource/Паўночная_Ірландыя> <
http://airpedia.org/ontology/type_with_conf#10> <
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Place>
So i'm going to import this in to dbpedia as follows; can someone confirm
whether i'm right?
<http://be.dbpedia.org/resource/Паўночная_Ірландыя> <
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Place>
type_with_conf#10 means accuracy around 100% right? So is it a good idea to
import only entries having config#10 or just import all without worrying
about it?
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Alessio Palmero Aprosio <[email protected]>wrote:
> Dear Kasun,
> on the web page
> http://www.airpedia.org/download/dbpedia-entity-types-in-31-languages/you can
> find the classes in 31 languages.
> The type is set to http://airpedia.org/ontology/type_with_conf#X , so you
> can import the triples into DBpedia without conflicts.
>
> In the next days, the Italian DBpedia team will release a new extraction
> (based on DBpedia 3.8) with these triple in it. The format in this case is
> slightly different: I'll write about it in the next e-mail.
>
> Let me know if you have troubles.
>
> Best,
> Alessio
>
> Il 18/06/13 03:10, kasun perera ha scritto:
>
> I started working on integrating Airpedia types to Dbpedia-links.
>
> As Marco mentioned previously, these are the 3 data-sets that I can use
> and I need to analyze what is the best data set that to be integrated in to
> the Dbpedia.
> <http://airpedia.org/extraction/10-all>
> extracted using classifier with all kernels and the bottom-to-top strategy.
> <http://airpedia.org/extraction/10-all-top>
> extracted using classifier with all kernels and the top-to-bottom strategy
> <http://airpedia.org/extraction/10-tpl>
> extracted using classifier with the sole template kernel and the
> bottom-to-top strategy
>
> In Alessio et. al. ESWC paper, I can see it has already done some tests
> to measure precision and recall of these classifications. Can I use those
> results to select best Airpedia data-set for dbpedia? or do I need to test
> with another data set(the ones Aleksander mentioned) to measure precision
> and recall?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Regards
>
> Kasun Perera
>
>
>
--
Regards
Kasun Perera
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-developers
