Hello All,
i've fixed the code according to JC update to Readlines
the latest update :
https://github.com/hadyelsahar/extraction-framework/commit/da3ddb8ee6d1274ca575805258e9bfb3603d82d7
I implemented the first solution (last value is null):
>
>
> https://github.com/dbpedia/extraction-framework/commit/c8d2f8b61b6bd868cbdc7b78f2ca28253bd4acd5
>
> It's on the dump branch, but I guess you can copy it over or so.
>
> I tried the Option[String] solution first, but I found that I had to
> make more intrusive changes to the existing code. And in general, I
> often find Scala's match/case structures less readable than
> if-then-else. For example, in your case, you probably need to handle
> the case line == null in the same code block as the case line != null,
> so you can hardly use match/case. But I may be wrong, I'm not a Scala
> expert.
does that mean that we have to update each line of code using the ReadLines
function in the extraction framework to check for null?
thanks
Regards
-------------------------------------------------
Hady El-Sahar
Research Assistant
Center of Informatics Sciences | Nile University<http://nileuniversity.edu.eg/>
email : [email protected]
Phone : +2-01220887311
http://hadyelsahar.me/
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/hadyelsahar>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-developers
