Michael Haas wrote: > Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> Michael Haas wrote: > >> You continue to miss my points, profoundly. Please step back, and >> then re-read this entire thread, and then you will more than likely >> discover the source of my angst re. your comments. >> >> Kingsley >> >> > > > My entire point was that enabling Anytime Queries by default is a bad > thing, especially when there is no way to turn off this behaviour > using the SPARQL protocol. It turns out that it is disabled unless you > specify the timeout parameter - if you had told me this, we'd both > have saved a lot of time. In fact, you told me I needed to set > specific parameters to disable it. > > > It goes without saying that you also missed my points. I acknowledged > several times that the Anytime Query feature has valid use cases, I > just said it mustn't be enabled by default as it is incomptaible with > the SPARQL protocol.
I am sure I missed some of your more salient points, but the treatise on SPARQL conformance was quite distracting, especially bearing in mind how much time and effort actually goes into making this instance available to the world. We started with a simple issue that became a two-way riddle due to a cluster node mis-configuration. Thus, in my eyes, I was naturally looking beyond the basics; assuming you had seen the text in the /sparql page and its default setting, since you were talking about large results and what appeared to be missing data etc. > > In any case, my concerns are invalid. Thanks. Great so were all set :-) > > Regards, > > Michael > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
