Kingsley Idehen wrote: > I am sure I missed some of your more salient points, but the treatise on > SPARQL conformance was quite distracting,
I did insist on that point because nobody dispelled my worries (till Mitko came along). ;) especially bearing in mind how > much time and effort actually goes into making this instance available > to the world. > And it is appreciated. > We started with a simple issue that became a two-way riddle due to a > cluster node mis-configuration. Thus, in my eyes, I was naturally > looking beyond the basics; assuming you had seen the text in the /sparql > page and its default setting, since you were talking about large results > and what appeared to be missing data etc. I used to use the /sparql website a lot for testing queries - these days, I am mainly using the ARQ libs which don't do the Anytime Query stuff. That probably explains why I assumed it was enabled by default - because it was the first thing you suggested when I talked about missing result sets. Or it was the fact there are two things to SPARQL: the SPARQL protocol and the SPARQL query language. >> In any case, my concerns are invalid. Thanks. > > Great so were all set :-) Yep! Have a nice weekend. Regards, Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
