Perhaps the Dbpedia Ontology is restricted to OWL Lite,  but I'd 
really like to see some disjointWith statements in it -- I've put the 
equivalent information in my system.

    One issue is that the top categories tend to be mutually exclusive:  
although you can be an Actor,  an Athlete and a Politician,  you can't 
be both a Person and a Place at the same time.  I think generally the 
things that are derived from owl:Thing are disjoint,  I mean you can't 
be a SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase and a AnatomicalStructure at the 
same time.  Maybe there are cases,  however,  where people conflate an 
Organization and a Place.

    I can think of a few places where disjointness would also be useful 
below the toplevel:  for instance,  under Species,  you can't be a Plant 
and an Animal at the same time -- I think you can only be one thing at 
one level in Species.  Place is more complex,  maybe a Mountain can be a 
ProtectedArea,  but a Island can't be a Cave.

------

    Another general complaint is that there are things sitting around at 
the toplevel that have obvious categories above them:  the dbpedia 
ontology does a lot better than Freebase than this (Freebase doesn't 
have "Work" over "Book" and "Film");  on the other hand,  it's obvious 
that "OlympicResult" has "SportsResult" above it,  and 
"SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase" has "CourtCase" above it.  It drives 
me nuts that Freebase doesn't have a base class for chemical elements 
and chemical compounds -- there's no type that's good for a "Moderator" 
property of a nuclear reactor since a moderator could be water 
(compound) or graphite (is that an element or a compound or an allotrope 
of an element or a mineral?)  Seems to me that Wikipedia should have a 
"Substance" category which would subsume ChemicalElement, Drug,  etc...

    Is the Dbpedia ontology frozen in stone at this point or can we 
still rationalize the toplevels a bit?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to