Hi Christopher
I think this example actually raises the issue of the underlying Wikipedia
(bad) practice of putting two infoboxes in the same page for two different
subjects. If there is enough detailed information for the product "Orion VII
Next Generation" to fill an infobox, this product IMO (with my Wikipedian
hat on) deserves its own article.
Meanwhile ... if there is more than one infobox in a page, take into account
only the infobox of which title matches the article title seems to me a good
heuristic. I don't think it's a good idea to create an URI for the
additional subject, likely to clash with some other URIs. Suppose the
product is called "Bellatrix" or "Betelgeuse", and you are into trouble.
Bernard
>
> > DBpedia resource types are generated based on Infoboxes
> > in Wikipedia articles. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_International
> > contains two Infoboxes - one for the company, one for its
> > current product. We should use two different RDF subjects
> > for the data extracted for these two infoboxes. It's on our
> > (rather long) to-do-list...
> >
> >
> > Christopher
> >
>
--
Bernard Vatant
Senior Consultant
Vocabulary & Data Engineering
Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459
Mail: [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------
Mondeca
3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France
Web: http://www.mondeca.com
Blog: http://mondeca.wordpress.com
----------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
