hi dbpedia, i've been really excited with the opencyc links, and am very impressed with what must be a very difficult reconciliation project. The newer links though maybe, are less accurate? has the algorithm changed since the summer?
I did a manual check of a (admittedly small) sample and found a 10% error rate- http://dbpedia.org/page/Dyne http://dbpedia.org/page/Divinity http://dbpedia.org/page/Logical_disjunction http://dbpedia.org/page/Daniel http://dbpedia.org/page/Datum http://dbpedia.org/page/Drawing http://dbpedia.org/page/Day http://dbpedia.org/page/Corum http://dbpedia.org/page/Coil http://dbpedia.org/page/Charge-coupled_device I'd like to get involved in this project, would it be helpful if I made a larger list of found (or suspected) errors? I'm not clear on how manually-editable either dbpedia or opencyc is. cheers ;) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
