Spencer Kelly wrote: > hi dbpedia, i've been really excited with the opencyc links, and am > very impressed with what must be a very difficult reconciliation > project. > The newer links though maybe, are less accurate? > has the algorithm changed since the summer? > > I did a manual check of a (admittedly small) sample and found a 10% error > rate- > > http://dbpedia.org/page/Dyne > http://dbpedia.org/page/Divinity > http://dbpedia.org/page/Logical_disjunction > http://dbpedia.org/page/Daniel > http://dbpedia.org/page/Datum > http://dbpedia.org/page/Drawing > http://dbpedia.org/page/Day > http://dbpedia.org/page/Corum > http://dbpedia.org/page/Coil > http://dbpedia.org/page/Charge-coupled_device > > I'd like to get involved in this project, would it be helpful if I > made a larger list of found (or suspected) errors? > I'm not clear on how manually-editable either dbpedia or opencyc is. > cheers ;) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Return on Information: > Google Enterprise Search pays you back > Get the facts. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Dbpedia-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion > > You can make a linkset containing fixed links between DBpedia and OpenCyc. Once this is done, at the very least, it can be loaded into a separate graph within the Virtuoso instance hosting DBpedia. This would be a stop-gap prior to fixing the errors etc..
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
