Hi everyone,

I was wondering if anyone has gone to the trouble of computing the "open" 
KB, as opposed the full closure which is provided in the downloads. 
Essentially, I'm looking for a version of dbpedia with all the redundancy 
removed. For example, the following four facts are in "instance_types_en.nt":

<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Abraham_Lincoln>
   <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>
   <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing> .
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Abraham_Lincoln>
   <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>
   <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person> .
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Abraham_Lincoln>
   <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>
   <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Politician> .
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Abraham_Lincoln>
   <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>
   <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/President> .

However, the first three facts are implied by the fourth using the dbpedia 
ontology (i.e., a President is-a politician, which is-a Person, which is-a 
Thing).

Before I go and write my own tool to produce this data set I thought I'd 
check to see if anyone has either a tool or a download I could use.

Thanks,
Jeff Pound


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand 
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you 
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to